Cognitive Map Accountancy
When prototyping cognitive map models, we don’t intentionally circumvent the mathematics of the platonic point, face, vertex, chord, or other entities to experimentally demonstrate those relationships. Quantitative complexities inherent in the physical variables of the vector matrix are not required accounting units in cognitive vector maps. Using generalized representations of point-nucleated, or even non-nucleated tetrahedrals defines the relationship between platonic metaphors and mapped knowledge concepts that can be understood without requiring discreet mathematical accuracy.